Pregnant "man" exposes lunacy of transgender agenda - and where it leads
Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby tells it like it is
Posted: April 14, 2008
This column is worth reading. Jeff Jacoby describes it perfectly. It originally appeared in the Boston Sunday Globe op-ed page on April 13, 2008. Note that Jacoby also ignores the AP Stylebook mandate that transgenders must be referred to by the masculine/feminine pronoun of their choice. Good for him!
PREGNANT, YES -- BUT NOT A MAN
Tracy LaGondino is pregnant, and that news has drawn a fair amount of attention. It's been in People magazine, on “Oprah,” all over the Internet. Tracy 's baby, due in July, is doing well. But Tracy has a serious problem, and the rest of us do, too.
A 34-year-old who grew up in Hawaii and used to compete in beauty contests -- she was once a finalist in the Miss Hawaii Teen USA pageant -- Tracy, who now calls herself Thomas Beatie, apparently suffers from Gender Identity Disorder, syndrome 302.85 in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) of the American Psychiatric Association. According to news accounts, she has felt uncomfortable with her female identity since adolescence. When she was in her 20s, the Telegraph of London reported, "she became more masculine," began a lesbian relationship, "and researched what it meant to be a transgender male." There followed breast-removal surgery and testosterone injections. Tracy/Thomas grew a beard, changed her legal identity to male, and married her partner, Nancy.
But it takes more than a mastectomy and hormone treatments to overturn biology. Thomas may be a man in the eyes of the law, but she remains physically a woman, with a woman's reproductive system, a woman's genitals, and a woman's chromosomes. So when she and Nancy decided to have a baby, she had little trouble conceiving through artificial insemination. The result is the spectacle that has drawn so much attention: a bearded pregnant woman named Thomas, who dresses and identifies herself as a man, and has a lawfully wedded wife.
What you make of all this most likely depends on your political outlook. Transgender activists, radical feminists, and others at the cultural extreme who insist that sex differences between men and women are patriarchal constructs, not hardwired facts of life, will applaud Thomas and Nancy as gender-bending pioneers challenging an oppressive male-female dichotomy. Those of us for whom gender is not a spectrum of possibilities but a matter of either/or are more likely to regard the whole situation as profoundly aberrant and detrimental -- especially for the baby about to be brought into the world.
This story of the pregnant "man" hasn't materialized in a vacuum.
The news out of Texas last week was of the police raid on a polygamist compound in which underage girls have been forcibly "married" to abusive older men. From Australia came word of John and Jennifer Deaves, the 61-year-old father and his 39-year-old daughter who have had two children together and pleaded guilty to incest, but say they just want "a little bit of respect and understanding" for their illicit relationship. These are only the latest in an endless series of reminders that sexual urges and appetites can be powerful and perverse and lead to harmful consequences, above all to the young and vulnerable. That is why human societies have always constrained sexual behavior with equally powerful taboos and moral standards.
Increasingly, though, anyone who upholds those taboos and standards is denounced as a narrow-minded bigot, while those who defy them are celebrated for their nonjudgmentalism and tolerance. (Come to think of it, why do the people who insist gender is fluid and subjective so often argue the opposite when it comes to race? If it is progressive not to pigeonhole human beings into just two sexes, it should be equally progressive to insist that no one be judged on the basis of race or color.)
It was Tracy/Thomas who took the story of her pregnancy public, writing it up for The Advocate, an online gay magazine.
"How does it feel to be a pregnant man? Incredible," she exulted. "Despite the fact that my belly is growing with a new life inside me, I am stable and confident being the man that I am. In a technical sense I see myself as my own surrogate, though my gender identity as male is constant."
Could anything be more incoherent or sad? Gender Identity Disorder is not "incredible," no matter how politically fashionable it has become to claim otherwise. It is not just another lifestyle choice, or simply one hue in the rainbow of diversity. It is a dysfunction. It should be met with sympathy, counseling, and therapy, not with five-page spreads in People and appearances on "Oprah."
The headlines notwithstanding, there is no "pregnant man." There is only a very confused and unsettled woman, who proclaims that surgery, hormones, and clothing made her a man, and who clings to that fiction with determination even as the baby growing in her womb announces her womanhood to the world.
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)