Larry   Cirignano trial to start Tuesday. 
Outrageous charges of "civil rights   violations" and "assault and battery" against Catholic activist at pro-marriage   rally by pro-homosexual activist / ACLU board member. Larry could face jail   time.
Latest development: Criminal complaint against Larry's accuser for   "disrupting a public meeting" over same incident. 
A complete breakdown   of justice. Larry Cirignano must be supported!
WORCESTER, MASSACHUSETTS (OCTOBER 11, 2007) On Tuesday, October 16, Catholic activist Larry Cirignano   will began standing trial in Worcester District Court on charges of "civil rights   violations" and "assault and battery" against a pro-homosexual activist (and   ACLU Board Member) who disrupted a pro-marriage rally last year -- and then claimed that Larry violated her rights! Larry could   face jail time if convicted, acknowledged his lawyer, Michael Gilleran.
People need to realize how serious this is. Larry is a victim of   the brutal tactics of the homosexual movement to stifle free speech, and the   increasing willingness of public authorities to acquiesce to them. If this is   not stopped, it will eventually happen to all of us.
 
Homosexual activist screaming to drown out speakers during Larry Cirignano's pro-marriage event Dec. 16, 2006. 
 
Background
On December 16, 2006, a group of pro-marriage activists had a   permit for a peaceful rally on the steps of Worcester City Hall. But an   organized group of homosexual activists and others came to disrupt it. They   screamed obscenities, and yelled to drown out the speakers, and mingled   throughout the area to intimidate the participants. One of them, Sarah Loy,   walked up and stood in front of the podium, held a pro-homosexual marriage sign,   and yelled at the crowd. Larry, who was running the rally, calmly led Loy to the   side. When Larry walked away, Loy tumbled to the ground and claimed that Larry   had physically thrown her down, and started screaming. According to several   witnesses we've spoken to, Loy staged the fall after Larry had left. (You can   see the video taken when she went to the ground and the reaction of the people   nearby and judge for yourself.)
  Here's our report of what happened that day, with   videos.
  This incident 
  has become a public cause for the homosexual community, which has been spreading the most vicious lies about Larry and the incident, and has been using their influence in government to propel the case against him. 
  
    Police charge Larry with assault and battery 
  The Worcester police (who have a history of supporting the   homosexual movement) almost immediately charged Larry with assault and battery,   although none of them witnessed the incident. (Several police were present, but   they allowed the disruptions to take place.)
  This is despite the fact that at least half a dozen eyewitnesses dispute the claims by the police. 
  
  Police and DA add "civil rights" charges against Larry 
  Then in February 2007, after a two-month "investigation", the   Worcester police and District Attorney Joseph Early, Jr. decided to additionally   charge Larry with an absurd "civil rights" violation, claiming that Loy had a   constitutional right to interfere and speak at Larry's rally, which Larry   violated! As before, they refused to charge Sarah Loy or the other   pro-homosexual activists with any violations.
As Worcester police spokesman Sgt. Kerry Hazelhurst told the   homosexual newspaper Bay Windows:
  "Through the D.A.'s office they're going to go   forward with civil rights violations and assault and battery charges . . .   [Police] investigated everything and talked to all involved and determined that   the elements for civil rights violations were met, and they decided to go with   it. It was an extensive and lengthy investigation."
If this doesn't defy belief, it gets worse . . .
  Bizarre ruling by judge against Larry on civil   rights charges
At a June 28 pre-trial hearing, Larry's lawyers petitioned Judge   David Ricciardone to drop the outlandish civil rights charge. But when   Ricciardone responded on July 13, he issued one of the most ridiculous written   decisions we have ever seen. He compared Larry's rally on the steps of the city   hall to a parade down a street, and said that Loy's actions were the same thing   as someone holding a sign as the parade passes by:
  "[T]he state may not require organizers of a   rally to include opposing groups as marchers in its parade, but it just as   certainty [sic] cannot prohibit the opposing groups from holding signs along the   intended route. In holding her sign at the rally here, the complainant was   simply expressing a view contrary to that being generally supported. This is   speech which is clearly and unassailably protected by the First and Fourteenth   Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and by the Massachusetts Bill of   Rights."
  Read Riccardone's entire decision here
Thus, Judge David Ricciardone is making the incredible claim that   anyone has the right to disrupt a legal, peaceful assembly of citizens with an   opposing message and claim "free speech." Which Constitution is this man   reading? Certainly not ours. Something is very wrong here.
  Finally - counter-charges against   Sarah Loy.
The trial date for Larry Cirignano was set for Monday, Oct. 15.   (It was laer moved to the following day, Tuesday, Oct. 16.) But then on Sept.   24 a criminal complaint against Sarah Loy for "disturbing a lawful assembly", a   violation of Massachusetts law, by the main organizer of Larry's rally, Shari   Worthington.
  Criminal complaint filed by Shari Worthington against Sarah Loy   for "disturbing a public assembly"
  Mass. Law Ch. 272, Sec. 40
A hearing has been set for Oct. 29 regarding the complaint against   Loy. At that hearing, a magistrate will decide whether to press formal charges. 
A problem for Sarah Loy -- so District   Attorney steps in
But this causes a big problem for Loy. If she testifies against   Larry in his trial, she risks incriminating herself in a trial against her! 
So the Assistant District Attorney, Joseph Quinlan, came to Loy's   aid and filed a "motion to continue" - to move Larry's trial until after her   hearings and/or trial. And Quinlan filed an accompanying affidavit stating that   in his opinion the criminal complaint against Loy "lacks any merit." (Obviously,   it's clear he won't be pursuing anything against Loy with any vigor -- your tax   dollars at work.)
  Quinlan's motion to continue
  Quinlan's affidavit supporting Loy
However, Larry's attorney, Michael Gilleran, filed a rebuttal to   Quinlan's motion and affidavit. Gilleran excellently outlines the facts of the   case, the legal issues involved, and reasons why Larry's trial should not be   moved. This is worth reading.
  Michael Gilleran's opposition to motion to continue (worth   reading)
A hearing was held this past Tuesday on Assistant DA Quinlan's   motion to continue. Interestingly, the judge ruled against Quinlan, largely on   the basis of Gilleran's strong rebuttal. Thus, Larry's trial will go on this   Tuesday as scheduled. It's absurd and shameful that the District Attorney and   Worcester Police Department would be bringing these charges to Larry at all -   instead of charging Loy and the homosexual activists who were disturbing the   peaceful rally last December. But to postpone the trial for Loy's convenience   would have been even worse.  Thus, the trial against Larry Cirignano takes place   next week, and his future (and ours) is at stake.
  Support Larry Cirignano!!
Larry Cirignano must be supported. If this is   allowed to happen to him, then the homosexual movement has legal carte blanche   to do this at any peaceful rally that citizens hold - and WE'LL be liable for   punishment if we don't allow it.
As you can imagine, the homosexual movement is doing everything it   can to make sure Larry is "punished" and ruin his reputation. (And they appear   to be positioning themselves for an additional civil lawsuit if they win.) But   Larry Cirignano is standing tall.
If you can, go to Worcester and support Larry. (Note: Larry and his lawyers ask that we NOT bring signs or demonstrate   at the courthouse.)
  DATES:    Tuesday, Oct. 16 - Friday, Oct. 19 
      TIME:     9:00 am
    PLACE:  Worcester   District Court
                  221 Main St.,   Worcester
                  (Probably the 4th floor, courtroom   21)
Other contact information:
  Worcester District Court
  District Attorney Joseph Early, Jr. / Asst. DA Joseph   Quinlan
  Worcester Police Dept