"Pandemic bill" goes to 6-person conference committee
 To make one bill out of   two radically different House & Senate versions
October 18, 2009 
Watching legislation at work is a pretty stomach-wrenching sport.
    
  As   we reported last week, the Massachusetts House largely re-wrote the Senate   version of the radical "Pandemic Control Bill", S2028, which had serious   constitutional civil rights issues, to say the least, and was being discussed   across the country, including on national Fox news programs.
  
  The House   version which was re-crafted by the House Ways and Means committee, renamed   H4271, took out much of the offensive language. But before we could analyze it,   the full House rammed through 17 amendments to change it even further. The final   house version, now named H4275, is finally posted.
  
  So now there are two   bills that have passed: the Senate version and the House version.
  
       Senate   version: S2028
  
       House   version: H4275
    
         General   info on Pandemic Bill
  
  The next step is for a "conference   committee" to take the two bills and make a third "final" bill out of it, which   will be sent to the Governor to sign. This is what's got people scared again.   The conference committee is made up of 3 reps and 3 senators -- two Democrats   and one Republican from each branch.
  The   Conference Committee
  From House - Reps: Jeffrey Sanchez (D-Boston), Mary Grant (D-Beverly)   and Lew Evangelidis (R-Holden)
      
    From Senate - Senators. Richard   Moore (D-Uxbridge), Susan Fargo(D-Lincoln) and Bob Hedlund   (R-Weymouth).
On the surface, this doesn't look good. Moore (who seems to be closely   connected with "Big Pharma") is the sponsor and champion of the original Senate   version, and Sanchez is an inner-city leftist who basically agrees with Moore.   Grant and Fargo are air-headed liberals. It's up to Evangelidis and Hedlund to   hold the line for sanity and constitutional rights. It's pretty scary when the   responsibility is given to 6 people out of a 200-person legislature to make   law.
    
  One thing's for sure. Judging from what's happened so far, if   this bill comes out bad, they will hear from a LOT of angry people.